Jasmine Clark says one thing. Her record says another.
We looked at Jasmine Clark's votes, financial disclosures, and campaign donors. Here's what we found.
Every claim is sourced from public legislative records, campaign finance filings, and news reporting.
She Filed a Blank Financial Disclosure
Jasmine Clark filed her 2025 Georgia personal financial disclosure completely blank — no assets, no income, no liabilities. Weeks later, her congressional financial disclosure revealed substantial holdings. Georgia voters were denied the transparency that federal law demands. This isn't a clerical oversight — it's a pattern. Her previous Georgia filings were consistently less detailed than what she disclosed to federal regulators. Voters can't hold elected officials accountable when they don't know who's paying them.
Check the Facts
She Voted for Data Center Tax Breaks
Clark voted YES on HB 1192 to extend sales tax exemptions for data centers — corporate giveaways that strain local power grids, consume massive water resources, and shift infrastructure costs to residential ratepayers. She only reversed course on consumer protection amendments after public outrage made the issue politically toxic. Meanwhile, CleanSpark — a Bitcoin mining company that bought five Georgia data centers — donated to her campaign. Georgia loses hundreds of millions in revenue from these breaks while public schools, hospitals, and infrastructure struggle.
Check the Facts
96% of Her Donors Are Outside the District
Of $249,413.90 in itemized individual contributions, just $3,450.00 — 1.38% — came from within GA-13. Clark's campaign is overwhelmingly funded by out-of-district money. She claims to represent GA-13, but her donor base tells a different story.
Check the Facts
Follow the Money
We pulled Clark's FEC filings. Here's where her campaign money is actually coming from.
$450,211
Total Receipts
Total campaign receipts reported to FEC
$249,414
Individual Itemized
55% of total — contributions over $200 from identifiable donors
$187,485
Unitemized
42% of total — contributions under $200, donors not disclosed
$12,167
PACs & Committees
3% of total — Political Action Committee contributions
Contribution Breakdown by Type
Contributor Geography
Only 1.38% of contributions came from GA-13
Clark claims to represent GA-13, but her donor base is almost entirely from outside the district. Out of $249,413.90 in itemized individual contributions, just $3,450 came from the people she wants to serve.
Notable Industry Contributions
$5,500
Gambling Industry
From gambling interests pushing for Georgia expansion
$500
TitleMax (Predatory Lender)
Fined $15M by CFPB for illegal lending practices
$500
CleanSpark (Bitcoin Mining)
Bought 5 Georgia data centers benefiting from tax breaks Clark supported
Multiple
Law Firm Contributions
From firms with active legislative interests
Check the Facts
She Took Money from Predatory Lender TitleMax
TitleMax was fined $15 million by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for predatory lending practices that trapped borrowers — often military families and low-income communities — in cycles of debt. Clark accepted a $500 campaign contribution from TitleMax. While $500 may seem small, it signals an openness to predatory industry money that contradicts her stated commitment to consumer protection. Veterans rallied at the Capitol demanding action against these lenders while Clark's campaign held their money.
Check the Facts
She Took $5,500 from the Gambling Industry
Clark received $5,500 in contributions from gambling industry interests. Georgia is one of the few states without legalized casino gambling or sports betting, and the industry has been aggressively lobbying for expansion. Clark has taken their money but avoided taking a clear public position on gambling expansion — keeping options open for donors while avoiding accountability to voters. Her campaign website promises to 'fight corporate influence' while accepting contributions from the industries she claims to oppose.
Check the Facts
She Was Late to AI Deepfake Protections
When HB 986 was introduced to regulate AI-generated deepfakes in political advertising, Clark was not among the co-sponsors. She only added her support to the later SB 9 version after the legislation had built significant bipartisan momentum. Jumping on a popular bill late isn't leadership — it's following. Georgia voters deserve a representative who leads on emerging threats to election integrity, not one who waits to see which way the wind blows.
Check the Facts
She Claims Credit on Childcare — Her Record Is Thin
Clark prominently features childcare on her campaign platform, but her actual legislative record is thin. Her signature achievement is voting YES on HB 136 #397 — a bipartisan foster care tax credit expansion that primarily benefits families who can already afford to foster. Advocates say these incremental measures don't address the structural affordability crisis. Childcare costs are crushing Georgia families, and voting for one popular bipartisan tax credit doesn't make you a childcare champion.
Check the Facts
Rural Hospitals Are Closing — She Was Barely There
Georgia's rural hospital crisis is well-documented, with multiple closures leaving communities without nearby emergency care. Clark's district touches communities affected by this crisis, but her advocacy on SB 170 and rural hospital stabilization came late, with minimal visible leadership. Rural hospital closures are literally a life-and-death issue. Constituents need a representative who makes this a priority, not an afterthought.
Check the Facts
The record is public. Read it yourself.
Every claim on this page is linked to public legislative records, campaign finance filings, and source reporting. We encourage you to check the facts and draw your own conclusions before you vote.